Infectious complications following transperineal prostate biopsy with or without periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis-a systematic review including meta-analysis of all comparative studies.
Summary
Across 23 comparative studies (including two RCTs; n≈12,324), omitting periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis for transperineal prostate biopsy did not increase genitourinary infections, fever, sepsis (0.16% vs 0.13%), or readmissions. Findings support antibiotic stewardship without compromising patient safety.
Key Findings
- No significant differences in GUI, fever, sepsis, or readmission between TPB with vs without prophylaxis (all p>0.25).
- Pooled sepsis incidence was very low and similar (0.16% with PAP vs 0.13% without).
- Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness; 30-day mortality was not observed.
Clinical Implications
Routine antibiotic prophylaxis for transperineal prostate biopsy can be safely omitted in most patients, aligning with stewardship goals; protocols should still consider high-risk individuals based on local epidemiology.
Why It Matters
Directly informs practice by showing no infection/sepsis reduction from prophylaxis in TPB, enabling de-implementation of routine antibiotics and reducing resistance pressure.
Limitations
- Heterogeneous study designs and incomplete endpoint reporting across studies
- Very low event rates limit precision for rare outcomes
Future Directions
Define criteria for selective prophylaxis in specific high-risk subgroups and evaluate cost-effectiveness and resistance impact of de-implementation.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
- Research Domain
- Prevention
- Evidence Level
- I - Systematic review/meta-analysis including randomized and comparative studies
- Study Design
- OTHER