Skip to main content

Infectious complications following transperineal prostate biopsy with or without periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis-a systematic review including meta-analysis of all comparative studies.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases2025-01-01PubMed
Total: 75.5Innovation: 7Impact: 8Rigor: 8Citation: 7

Summary

Across 23 comparative studies (including two RCTs; n≈12,324), omitting periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis for transperineal prostate biopsy did not increase genitourinary infections, fever, sepsis (0.16% vs 0.13%), or readmissions. Findings support antibiotic stewardship without compromising patient safety.

Key Findings

  • No significant differences in GUI, fever, sepsis, or readmission between TPB with vs without prophylaxis (all p>0.25).
  • Pooled sepsis incidence was very low and similar (0.16% with PAP vs 0.13% without).
  • Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness; 30-day mortality was not observed.

Clinical Implications

Routine antibiotic prophylaxis for transperineal prostate biopsy can be safely omitted in most patients, aligning with stewardship goals; protocols should still consider high-risk individuals based on local epidemiology.

Why It Matters

Directly informs practice by showing no infection/sepsis reduction from prophylaxis in TPB, enabling de-implementation of routine antibiotics and reducing resistance pressure.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneous study designs and incomplete endpoint reporting across studies
  • Very low event rates limit precision for rare outcomes

Future Directions

Define criteria for selective prophylaxis in specific high-risk subgroups and evaluate cost-effectiveness and resistance impact of de-implementation.

Study Information

Study Type
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
Research Domain
Prevention
Evidence Level
I - Systematic review/meta-analysis including randomized and comparative studies
Study Design
OTHER