Skip to main content

Prevalence, misclassification, and clinical consequences of the heteroresistant phenotype in Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in patients in Uppsala, Sweden: a retrospective cohort study.

The Lancet. Microbe2025-01-20PubMed
Total: 77.5Innovation: 8Impact: 8Rigor: 7Citation: 9

Summary

Among 255 E. coli bloodstream infections, heteroresistance was common (gentamicin 43%, piperacillin-tazobactam 9%) and misclassified as susceptible in 96% of cases by routine testing. When patients received the implicated antibiotic, heteroresistance was associated with higher odds of intermediate/ICU admission and mortality. Length of stay was unaffected.

Key Findings

  • Breakpoint-crossing heteroresistance was detected in 43% (gentamicin) and 9% (piperacillin-tazobactam) of E. coli isolates; <1% for cefotaxime.
  • Routine clinical susceptibility testing misclassified 96% (120/125) of heteroresistant isolates as susceptible.
  • In patients treated with the implicated drug, heteroresistance was associated with higher odds of intermediate care (piperacillin-tazobactam BCHR: OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–9.6) and ICU admission and mortality (gentamicin BCHR: ICU OR 5.6; mortality OR 7.1).
  • Heteroresistance showed no association with length of hospital stay.

Clinical Implications

Consider heteroresistance in treatment failures; integrate population analysis or alternative detection algorithms for high-risk antibiotics; avoid monotherapy with agents showing BCHR when feasible.

Why It Matters

Demonstrates a prevalent, under-recognized resistance phenotype with direct adverse outcome implications, challenging current susceptibility testing workflows and stewardship practices.

Limitations

  • Single-region retrospective cohort limits generalizability
  • Focused on three antibiotics; broader spectrum agents not assessed

Future Directions

Develop rapid clinical assays for heteroresistance detection and evaluate stewardship interventions and outcome impacts in multicenter prospective studies.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Diagnosis
Evidence Level
III - Retrospective cohort with laboratory phenotyping and clinical outcomes
Study Design
OTHER