Skip to main content

INFORMING INTENSIVE CARE UNIT DIGITAL TWINS: DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF CARDIORESPIRATORY FAILURE TRAJECTORIES IN PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS.

Shock (Augusta, Ga.)2025-01-23PubMed
Total: 74.5Innovation: 8Impact: 7Rigor: 7Citation: 8

Summary

Using an unsupervised two-stage clustering of 19,177 ICU sepsis patients over 8 years, the authors identified four robust cardiorespiratory support trajectories with dramatically different mortality (fast/slow recovery vs fast/delayed decline). Clusters were associated with comorbidity and severity scores, providing a basis for predictive analytics and ICU digital twin decision support.

Key Findings

  • Identified four distinct ICU trajectories: fast recovery (27%, mortality 3.5%), slow recovery (62%, mortality 3.6%), fast decline (4%, mortality 99.7%), and delayed decline (7%, mortality 97.9%).
  • Trajectories were robust and separable by Charlson Comorbidity Index, APACHE III, and day 1/3 SOFA scores (ANOVA P<0.001).
  • Modeling used unsupervised two-stage clustering of dynamic cardiorespiratory support and hospital discharge status over the first 14 ICU days.
  • Large retrospective cohort from Mayo Clinic hospitals (N=19,177) spanning 8 years.

Clinical Implications

Trajectory-aware tools could enhance communication with families, guide levels of support, and target interventions to those on decline trajectories early.

Why It Matters

Defines clinically interpretable, dynamic ICU trajectories at scale, enabling precision prognostication and informing resource allocation and digital-twin-driven decision support in sepsis.

Limitations

  • Retrospective single health system; external validation not reported.
  • Clusters are associative; causal inferences and intervention effects cannot be drawn.

Future Directions

Prospective validation across diverse ICUs; integration into real-time dashboards; testing trajectory-informed interventions and digital twin simulations.

Study Information

Study Type
Cohort
Research Domain
Prognosis
Evidence Level
IV - Large retrospective cohort with unsupervised machine learning clustering
Study Design
OTHER