Seven vs Fourteen Days of Antibiotics for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review and Noninferiority Meta-Analysis.
Total: 82.5Innovation: 7Impact: 9Rigor: 9Citation: 8
Summary
Pooling four RCTs (n=3,729 ITT), 7 days of antibiotics for Gram-negative bloodstream infections had a 90-day mortality risk ratio of 0.91 (95% CrI, 0.69–1.22) vs 14 days, with a 97.8% probability of noninferiority (margin 1.25). Results were consistent in per-protocol analyses.
Key Findings
- Four RCTs (n=3,729 ITT) comparing 7 vs 14 days showed 90-day mortality RR 0.91 (95% CrI, 0.69–1.22) with 97.8% probability of noninferiority.
- Per-protocol analyses (n=3,126) yielded RR 0.93 (95% CrI, 0.68–1.32) with 95.1% noninferiority probability.
- Trials included adults with Gram-negative bloodstream infections and adequate source control.
- Bayesian random-effects models with prespecified NI margin (1.25) and PRISMA-conformant methods were used.
Clinical Implications
For adults with Gram-negative bacteremia and adequate source control, clinicians can consider 7-day therapy, aligning with stewardship goals while maintaining outcomes.
Why It Matters
High-quality evidence supports shorter antibiotic courses, informing stewardship and potentially reducing adverse events, resistance, and costs.
Limitations
- Generalizability limited to patients similar to included RCTs (adequate source control, clinical stability criteria).
- Noninferiority conclusions depend on the chosen margin and heterogeneity assumptions.
Future Directions
Define subgroups (e.g., immunocompromise, deep foci) where shorter courses may or may not apply; evaluate patient-centered outcomes and resistance emergence.
Study Information
- Study Type
- Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with ITT and PP analyses.
- Study Design
- OTHER