Efficacy of targeting high mean arterial pressure for older patients with septic shock (OPTPRESS): a multicentre, pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Summary
In a multicenter pragmatic RCT of 518 patients ≥65 years with septic shock, targeting MAP 80–85 mmHg increased 90-day mortality versus 65–70 mmHg (39.3% vs 28.6%; risk difference 10.7%). No subgroup benefited, including those with chronic hypertension; renal replacement therapy–free days were fewer with the high-MAP strategy.
Key Findings
- 90-day all-cause mortality was higher with MAP 80–85 mmHg vs 65–70 mmHg (39.3% vs 28.6%; risk difference 10.7%; 95% CI 2.6–18.9).
- Renal replacement therapy–free days at 28 days were fewer in the high-target group.
- No subgroup, including patients with chronic hypertension, derived benefit from a higher MAP target.
- Trial was stopped early for harm based on interim analysis.
Clinical Implications
Avoid targeting MAP 80–85 mmHg in elderly septic shock; standard targets of 65–70 mmHg should be preferred. Monitor for potential renal support needs when higher vasopressor targets are considered.
Why It Matters
This trial provides definitive evidence that higher MAP targets harm elderly septic shock patients, directly informing hemodynamic targets in guidelines.
Limitations
- Open-label design may introduce performance bias
- Generalizability primarily to older Japanese ICU population; target maintained for first 72 hours
Future Directions
Assess individualized MAP targets integrating frailty, vascular stiffness, and microcirculatory endpoints; evaluate downstream renal and cardiovascular adverse effects of higher vasopressor exposure.
Study Information
- Study Type
- RCT
- Research Domain
- Treatment
- Evidence Level
- I - Multicenter randomized controlled trial with prespecified outcomes and early stopping for harm.
- Study Design
- OTHER