Daily Anesthesiology Research Analysis
Three clinically oriented studies stand out today in anesthesiology and critical care: a randomized trial shows immediate oral fluid “sipping” after extubation is safe and improves comfort; a large cardiac surgery cohort clarifies that CABG-associated AKI predicts MACCE and CKD, while its link to mortality is mediated by other major complications; and an RCT finds single-shot liposomal bupivacaine serratus anterior plane block improves early quality of recovery after VATS versus a continuous cat
Summary
Three clinically oriented studies stand out today in anesthesiology and critical care: a randomized trial shows immediate oral fluid “sipping” after extubation is safe and improves comfort; a large cardiac surgery cohort clarifies that CABG-associated AKI predicts MACCE and CKD, while its link to mortality is mediated by other major complications; and an RCT finds single-shot liposomal bupivacaine serratus anterior plane block improves early quality of recovery after VATS versus a continuous catheter.
Research Themes
- Post-extubation comfort and safety
- Perioperative organ injury and long-term outcomes
- Regional anesthesia strategies for thoracic surgery
Selected Articles
1. Immediate "sipping" vs. delayed oral fluid intake after extubation: A randomized controlled trial.
In a single-center RCT of 160 ICU patients post-extubation, immediate oral fluid “sipping” (up to 3 mL/kg over 2 hours) was safe, yielded greater thirst relief, and reduced throat discomfort versus delaying fluids by 2 hours, without aspiration events. Adverse effects were rare and similar between groups, challenging traditional fasting practices.
Impact: This pragmatic RCT directly informs a ubiquitous post-extubation practice, demonstrating that early oral fluids improve comfort without compromising safety. It provides actionable evidence to update ICU bedside protocols.
Clinical Implications: Consider permitting supervised immediate small-volume sipping after extubation (up to 3 mL/kg over 2 hours) to improve patient comfort, with routine monitoring for nausea/vomiting. Protocols can safely replace blanket fasting with early rehydration pathways.
Key Findings
- Immediate sipping did not increase adverse events; no aspiration occurred.
- Greater thirst relief at 120 minutes in the sipping group (absolute difference 10%, p=0.0338).
- Lower throat discomfort at 90 minutes with sipping (difference −18.7%, p=0.0118).
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized controlled design with prespecified symptom and safety assessments.
- Frequent time-point measurements enabling temporal resolution of comfort and adverse effects.
Limitations
- Single-center trial with short (2-hour) observation window post-extubation.
- Subjective primary outcomes; results may not generalize to non-ICU or high-aspiration-risk populations.
Future Directions: Multicenter trials including high-risk populations, evaluation of aspiration biomarkers and longer-term outcomes (e.g., pneumonia), and integration into ERAS/ICU liberation bundles.
PURPOSE: Despite advances in perioperative care, delayed oral fluid intake after extubation remains common and is often based on tradition rather than evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether immediate oral fluid intake "sipping" after extubation reduces thirst and discomfort and is safe in an intensive care setting. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 160 ICU patients who met extubation criteria were randomized 1:1 to either delayed fluid intake (2 h post-extubation) or immediate sipping (up to 3 ml/kg over 2 h). Thirst, discomfort, and adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, aspiration) were assessed at 0, 5, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Thirst relief was also evaluated in the experimental group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: At 120 min, 64 of 80 patients in each group (80 %; 95 % CI: 70-88 %) reported thirst. The difference between groups was 0.0 % (95 % CI: -12 % to 12 %; p = 1.000). However, thirst relief between baseline and 120 min was observed in 11.3 % of patients in the sipping group (95 % CI: 5-20 %) vs. 1.3 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 0-7 %), with a difference of 10 % (95 % CI: 1-19 %; p = 0.0338). At 90 min, throat discomfort was present in 23.8 % of the sipping group (95 % CI: 15-35 %) vs. 42.5 % in the standard group (95 % CI: 32-54 %), with a difference of -18.7 % (95 % CI: -34 % to -3 %; p = 0.0118). Adverse effects (nausea, vomiting) were rare and comparable; no aspiration events were observed. CONCLUSION: Immediate oral fluid intake "sipping"after extubation appears to be safe, improves thirst relief, and reduces discomfort in ICU patients without increasing adverse effects. These findings challenge traditional fasting practices and support early rehydration in post-extubation care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on January 6, 2023 (Identifier: NCT05819645).
2. The Role of Other Major Postoperative Complications in Determining Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.
In 2,287 CABG patients, AKI occurred in 20% and was linked to higher 30-day mortality and worse long-term outcomes overall. Crucially, after excluding patients with other major complications, AKI no longer predicted mortality but remained associated with increased MACCE and postoperative CKD, suggesting mortality effects are mediated by concurrent complications.
Impact: This study refines the prognostic interpretation of CABG-associated AKI by disentangling the contribution of other major complications. It redirects clinical focus toward long-term cardio-renal surveillance and prevention rather than mortality attribution to AKI per se.
Clinical Implications: Prioritize risk stratification and follow-up for MACCE and CKD in patients experiencing AKI after CABG, even when early mortality risk seems mitigated. Perioperative pathways should target prevention of both AKI and other major complications to reduce mediated mortality.
Key Findings
- AKI incidence after isolated CABG was 20.1% (stages 1–3: 16.4%, 1.6%, 2.1%).
- Overall, AKI was associated with higher 30-day mortality (HR 2.02) and worse long-term mortality (HR 1.46) and MACCE (HR 1.48).
- After excluding patients with other major complications, AKI did not predict short- or long-term mortality but remained associated with inferior MACCE-free survival (HR 1.59) and higher postoperative CKD risk.
Methodological Strengths
- Large, nearly two-decade cohort with propensity score matching and sensitivity analyses excluding major complications.
- Use of standardized KDIGO creatinine criteria and time-to-event modeling for short- and long-term outcomes.
Limitations
- Single-center, retrospective design with potential residual confounding and selection bias.
- AKI and CKD definitions based on serum creatinine; urine output and granular renal biomarkers were not included.
Future Directions: Prospective multicenter studies incorporating mediation analyses, kidney injury biomarkers, and interventions targeting both AKI prevention and mitigation of concurrent complications.
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and is associated with worse outcomes. It remains unclear whether AKIs impact on prognosis can be attributed to other concurrent major complications. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG at a single nationwide center from 2001 to 2020. Patients receiving preoperative dialysis and those with insufficient pre- and postoperative serum creatinine values were excluded. AKI and postoperative chronic kidney disease were defined by the serum creatinine component of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes criteria. Cox regression was used to estimate the impact of AKI on short- and long-term risk of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE); before and after excluding patients with other major complications. Propensity score matching was used to balance heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of 2287 individuals, criteria for AKI were met by 459 (20.1%), distributed as 375 (16.4%), 36 (1.6%), and 48 (2.1%) for Stages 1 through 3, respectively. The incidence of any major complication was 561 (24.5%), with 203 (8.9%) individuals having both AKI and major complications. Patients with AKI were older and had a higher incidence of comorbidities. AKI was associated with higher 30-day mortality (HR: 2.02, CI: 1.10-3.70) and inferior long-term outcomes (mortality, HR: 1.46; CI: 1.14-1.86; MACCE, HR: 1.48, CI: 1.20-1.81), but also predicted a higher hazard of postoperative chronic kidney disease (HR: 1.82, CI: 2.53-2.17). However, after excluding patients with other major complications, AKI was not associated with short- or long-term mortality but predicted inferior MACCE-free survival (HR: 1.59, CI: 1.23-2.06). CONCLUSIONS: AKI following CABG was not associated with short- and long-term mortality in the absence of major complications but predicted a higher risk of MACCE and postoperative chronic kidney disease. These results highlight AKIs role in progressive renal dysfunction and long-term cardiovascular morbidity, while its association with short-term mortality may be mediated by other major complications.
3. Comparison of continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block (cSAPB) with bupivacaine versus single liposomal bupivacaine block in postoperative analgesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS): a randomized controlled trial.
In a randomized trial (n=70) after VATS, single-shot liposomal bupivacaine SAPB improved QoR-15 at 24 and 48 hours and reduced local block-related complications versus continuous catheter SAPB. Pain scores, pulmonary function, and opioid consumption did not differ between groups.
Impact: Head-to-head RCT evidence comparing continuous catheter versus single-shot liposomal formulation informs block selection beyond pain scores by highlighting recovery quality and safety differences.
Clinical Implications: For VATS, single-shot liposomal bupivacaine SAPB can be considered when prioritizing early recovery quality and fewer local complications, especially where catheter management resources are limited. Cost, availability, and institutional policies should be weighed.
Key Findings
- QoR-15 scores were higher in the liposomal bupivacaine group at 24 hours (p=0.001) and 48 hours (p=0.02).
- Pain scores at rest and during deep breathing, pulmonary function (FEV1/FVC), and opioid use were similar between groups.
- Local complications (e.g., swelling, pain at site) were reduced with liposomal bupivacaine (p=0.03).
Methodological Strengths
- Randomized controlled design with prespecified primary (QoR-15) and multiple secondary outcomes.
- Direct comparison of continuous catheter technique versus single-shot long-acting formulation.
Limitations
- Single-center sample with modest size (n=70); blinding details not described, introducing potential performance bias.
- Short follow-up (48 hours); cost-effectiveness and longer-term respiratory outcomes not assessed.
Future Directions: Multicenter, blinded trials with cost-effectiveness analyses and longer-term outcomes (atelectasis, pneumonia, chronic pain) to define optimal SAPB strategies after thoracic surgery.
BACKGROUND: Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is a commonly used minimally invasive technique in thoracic surgery. The continuous serratus anterior plane block (cSAPB) involves the placement of a catheter deep in the serratus anterior fascia for the slow and continuous infusion of local anesthetics. Liposomal bupivacaine is a formulation of bupivacaine encapsulated in liposomes, which prolongs the release of the drug. This study compares the impact of cSAPB with bupivacaine and single-shot SAPB with liposomal bupivacaine on postoperative recovery quality and pain control after VATS. METHODS: This study is a Randomized Controlled Trial. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving cSAPB with conventional bupivacaine (cSAPB + CB) (n = 35) and the other receiving SAPB with liposomal bupivacaine (SAPB + LB) (n = 35). The primary outcome measure was the Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) scores at 24 and 48 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included: pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scale at rest and during deep breathing at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, postoperative pulmonary function, total opioid consumption during and after surgery, and adverse events. RESULTS: QoR-15 scores were significantly elevated in the SAPB + LB group at both 24 and 48 h post-surgery(24 h: p = 0.001; 48 h: p = 0.02). Comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the SAPB + CB group and the SAPB + LB group in terms of VAS scores for pain at rest at 24 and 48 h (24 h: p = 0.06; 48 h: p = 0.46), or during deep breathing (24 h: p = 0.45; 48 h: p = 0.73). Additionally, there were no significant differences in lung function tests (FEV1/FVC ratio, p = 0.95), total intraoperative opioid consumption (p = 0.76), or total postoperative opioid consumption (p = 0.69). However, the incidence of local complications such as swelling and pain was significantly reduced in the SAPB + LB group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The use of single liposomal bupivacaine serratus anterior plane block provides superior early postoperative recovery quality and reduces the incidence of local complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100054089, June 28,2024.