Daily ReportOct 30, 2026
Anesthesiology, October 30 edition
We read 65 papers and selected 3.
Summary
The most impactful papers address quantitative anesthesia monitoring, perioperative medication safety, and clinically actionable interpretation of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. The strongest evidence comes from a meta-analysis of 87 randomized trials showing benefits of processed electroencephalography-guided anesthesia, while two systematic reviews clarify evolving GLP-1 receptor agonist guidance and human toxicity concentration ranges for local anesthetics.
Research Themes
- Processed electroencephalography-guided anesthesia and postoperative delirium
- Perioperative management of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors
- Human plasma concentrations associated with local anesthetic systemic toxicity
Selected Articles
1. Processed electroencephalogram-guided anesthesia and its impact on postoperative delirium and perioperative efficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 87 randomized controlled trials involving 30,611 patients. pEEG-guided anesthesia reduced propofol and volatile anesthetic use, decreased postoperative delirium by 27% (RR 0.73), and modestly shortened extubation, awakening, orientation, and PACU times. Benefits were most consistently demonstrated with BIS, while evidence for Entropy and SEDLine was less precise.
Impact: The large randomized evidence base supports pEEG as more than a depth-monitoring technology, linking anesthetic titration with delirium prevention and operating-room efficiency. Its device-stratified analysis also identifies where evidence is strong and where further trials are needed.
Clinical Implications: pEEG-guided titration, particularly with BIS, may be considered to reduce excessive anesthetic exposure and postoperative delirium risk, especially in older or delirium-vulnerable patients. Clinicians should recognize that absolute benefits may vary by device, patient population, anesthetic technique, and baseline delirium-prevention practices.
Key Findings
- Eighty-seven randomized controlled trials involving 30,611 patients were included.
- pEEG reduced propofol use and volatile anesthetic use, with standardized mean differences of -0.42 and -1.27, respectively.
- Postoperative delirium risk decreased by 27% with pEEG-guided anesthesia, while extubation, awakening, orientation, and PACU times were modestly shorter.
Methodological Strengths
- Large synthesis of randomized controlled trials with a prospectively registered protocol in PROSPERO.
- Evaluation of both patient-centered outcomes, including delirium, and operational outcomes, including recovery times and anesthetic consumption.
Limitations
- Substantial heterogeneity was present for several outcomes.
- Evidence for Entropy and SEDLine was less precise because relatively few studies evaluated these devices, and the meta-analysis cannot establish that pEEG itself caused all observed benefits.
Future Directions: Future trials should use standardized delirium definitions, report protocol adherence and anesthetic exposure in detail, and directly compare pEEG technologies in diverse surgical populations. Pragmatic studies should also assess cost-effectiveness and implementation across different monitoring environments.
BACKGROUND: Processed electroencephalography (pEEG) provides quantitative indices for monitoring anesthetic depth and is recommended in international guidelines. Prior meta-analyses have assessed EEG-guided anesthesia but none have evaluated available evidence stratified by pEEG technology. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgical, endoscopic, or dental procedures comparing pEEG-guided with non-pEEG-guided anesthesia. Primary outcomes were anesthetic drug use (TIVA and volatile agents) and postoperative delirium (POD ≤10 days). Secondary outcomes were extubation time, wake-up time, time to orientation, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay.
2. Perioperative management of patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists: A comparative review of international clinical guidelines.
This comparative review systematically identified and appraised five major perioperative GLP-1 receptor agonist guidelines published between 2023 and 2026. Four of five guidelines now favor continuation with modified fasting and individualized mitigation rather than routine cessation, although gastric ultrasound thresholds, fasting protocols, and management of high-risk patients remain inconsistent. The review highlights limited prospective outcome data and gaps in multidisciplinary guideline development.
Impact: GLP-1 receptor agonists are widely used for diabetes and obesity, making perioperative decisions relevant to a rapidly expanding patient population. This review directly addresses conflicting guidance and supports a transition from blanket drug cessation toward individualized, evidence-informed risk management.
Clinical Implications: Routine discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists before anesthesia may no longer be appropriate for every patient. Anesthesia teams should assess gastrointestinal symptoms, dosing phase, dose escalation, comorbidities, glycemic risk, and procedure urgency; use modified fasting or gastric ultrasound selectively; and coordinate decisions with prescribing clinicians. SGLT2 inhibitor management should remain focused on preventing euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis through preoperative discontinuation according to current guidance.
Key Findings
- Five major perioperative GLP-1 receptor agonist guidelines published between 2023 and 2026 were identified and assessed using the AGREE-REX framework.
- Four of five guidelines recommended continuation with structured fasting modification, replacing the earlier routine cessation approach.
- All five guidelines endorsed gastric ultrasound, but none established validated decision thresholds; prospective data on aspiration and glycemic complications remain limited.
Methodological Strengths
- Systematic searching across biomedical databases, professional society websites, and grey literature.
- Independent guideline appraisal by two reviewers using AGREE-REX, with examination of the primary evidence underlying each recommendation.
Limitations
- Only five eligible guidelines were identified, and the review does not provide new prospective estimates of aspiration or metabolic complications.
- Guideline recommendations may be influenced by incomplete representation of endocrinology and obesity medicine specialists, and gastric ultrasound thresholds remain unvalidated.
Future Directions: Prospective multicenter studies should compare continuation and temporary interruption strategies while measuring aspiration events, gastric contents, glycemic complications, and delays or cancellations of surgery. Future guidelines should include broader multidisciplinary representation and develop validated gastric ultrasound-based algorithms.
GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are now routinely encountered in preoperative assessment. Their effect on gastric emptying raises concern about pulmonary aspiration risk during anesthesia. Five major professional bodies have published perioperative guidance since 2023, reaching divergent conclusions on four clinically important questions. A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, professional society websites, and grey literature was conducted for perioperative GLP-1 RA guidelines published between January 2023 and March 2026. Five documents met eligibility criteria. Each was independently appraised by two reviewers using the AGREE-REX framework, and primary studies underpinning the guidelines were reviewed for four pre-specified clinical questions.
3. Defining plasma concentration ranges for central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity of local anesthetics: A systematic review.
This systematic review synthesized 48 human studies, predominantly case reports and case series, examining plasma concentrations measured near the onset of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Central nervous system toxicity generally occurred at lower concentrations than severe cardiovascular toxicity, and moderate neurologic symptoms occurred at lower concentrations than seizures or coma. Because of substantial heterogeneity, the authors appropriately presented clinically useful concentration ranges narratively rather than as absolute thresholds.
Impact: LAST is uncommon but potentially catastrophic, and clinicians often lack a reliable framework for interpreting measured local anesthetic concentrations. This review converts fragmented human evidence into practical reference ranges while explicitly preventing overinterpretation of concentration cutoffs.
Clinical Implications: Measured plasma concentrations may help contextualize suspected LAST, particularly when symptoms and timing are compatible, but treatment should never be delayed while awaiting laboratory results. Clinicians should interpret concentrations according to the specific local anesthetic, sampling site, timing, clinical phenotype, and severity; lipid emulsion therapy and standard resuscitation remain guided by clinical presentation rather than a numeric threshold.
Key Findings
- Forty-eight human studies were included, predominantly case reports and case series, with concentrations measured within 5 minutes of symptom onset.
- Central nervous system toxicity generally occurred at lower plasma concentrations than severe cardiovascular toxicity across the local anesthetics evaluated.
- The concentration ranges should be used as clinical reference ranges rather than absolute toxicity thresholds because of substantial heterogeneity.
Methodological Strengths
- The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO and used broad database searches without language restrictions.
- Eligibility required human plasma concentrations measured close to symptom onset, improving the clinical relevance of the synthesized concentration data.
Limitations
- Most included evidence came from case reports and case series, with substantial heterogeneity in patient characteristics, sampling methods, and assay timing.
- The absence of a formal meta-analysis and the potential for publication and measurement bias limit the precision and generalizability of the proposed concentration ranges.
Future Directions: Prospective registries and standardized pharmacokinetic studies should collect timed arterial and venous concentrations alongside detailed clinical phenotypes and treatment interventions. Future work should examine whether concentration-informed decision support improves recognition, resuscitation, and outcomes in suspected LAST.
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), although rare, can lead to severe central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular system (CVS) complications, including seizures and cardiac arrest. Reliable human plasma concentration thresholds associated with CNS and CVS toxicity remain poorly defined, limiting clinicians' ability to contextualize measured concentrations. This systematic review aimed to evaluate human data to define plasma concentration ranges associated with moderate and severe CNS and CVS toxicity following the administration of commonly used local anesthetics in adult and pediatric patients. This systematic review was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD420251274220). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception through December 27, 2025, with no language restrictions.